Mail address:
Newsletters
Martin 9/12 Calendar (& City of Stuart)
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
SSN: Maggy Hurchalla Drops a Bomb in Lake Point Appeal
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Environmentalist Maggy Hurchalla Loses in Court; Jury Awards Rock Mine $4.4 Million
Environmentalist Maggy Hurchalla Loses in Court; Jury Awards Rock Mine $4.4 Million
Sunday, October 15, 2017
Martin County Government Gone Wild: How Elected Officials Tried To Hide, Alter Records!
Martin County Government Gone Wild: How Elected Officials Tried To Hide, Alter Records!
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
The Mind Of A Technocrat Is Rooted In The Religion Of Scientism
The Mind Of A Technocrat Is Rooted In The Religion Of Scientism
- Above all, the technocrat believes that technics must replace politics and defines his own role in apolitical terms… he has great confidence in the possibility of solving the problems of society by a scientific approach.
- The technocrat is skeptical and even hostile toward politicians and political institutions.
- The technocrat is fundamentally unsympathetic to the openness and equality of political democracy.
- The technocrat believes that social and political conflict is, at best misguided, and at worst, contrived
- The technocrat rejects ideological or moralistic criteria, preferring to debate policy in practical, “pragmatic terms.”
- The technocrat is strongly committed to technological progress and material productivity: he is less concerned about distributive questions of social justice. (Putnam, 1977, “Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies”, Comparative Political Studies, 10, pp. 285-387)
Friday, August 4, 2017
Florida Special Session
Florida Special Session
Monday, March 13, 2017
Flashback: Rick Perry Tied To Agenda 21, Globalist Policies
Flashback: Rick Perry Tied To Agenda 21, Globalist Policies
Terry Hall is a legendary Texan who successfully fought against George Bush’s globalist plan to create a North American Union, which was first to be realized by the “trans-Texas corridor”. Rick Perry was Governor of Texas at the time, and he fought true conservatives and anti-Agenda 21 patriots tooth and nail to finish the corridor. Now Perry is Secretary of Energy, which is key to America’s infrastructure. ⁃ TN Editor
Monday, August 24, 2015
A NEW SYMBOL HAS BEEN CAST: PEOPLE • PROPERTY • LIBERTY
August 24, 2015
NewsWithViews.com
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Obama’s War on Coal reveals a strategy for Martin County against AAF
Now that our esteemed Board of County Commissioners has expressed its unanimous opposition to the All Aboard Florida plan to use Martin County as a doormat, perhaps it is time for them to show some real courage and to take timely steps to stop the “public-private” juggernaut in its “tracks.”
The national discussion about the Administration’s recent extralegal proclamation on clean-air standards, threatening to ruin the economies of many states, reveals a little-known strategy to stop federal overreach and the trampling of states’ rights. All federal agencies are required to consult with the EPA. If they have not, it creates a “cause of action” against the federal agency. The EPA almost never issues a report about the very impact we are concerned about - the human environment. This same strategy was used in Texas to stop (and re-route) the Trans-Texas Corridor which threatened to split the local jurisdictions into remote and inaccessible parts.
An article by James Simpson on Trevor Louden’s NewZeal blog discusses the method built into environmental regulations that makes it possible for local authorities to demand compliance with the federal government’s own regulations. These regulations are so restrictive, that any business plan that requires timely progress to reach its goal will be unlikely to succeed.
The Commission must do two things:
- Appoint or designate and official commission to regulate or oversee the business in question (we already have people in public transportation boards), and
- Have the “commission” file a complaint with the Department of Justice against the the Federal Rail Administration which issues permits for the building or expansion of railroads.
The rule that enables this strategy is called “coordination.” As discussed in the article by Simpson,
Coordination is a little-known feature embedded in numerous environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, the Endangered Species Act and other laws.
Coordination requires the EPA and all other federal agencies to consider all effects of environmental regulations. These effects include:
- ecological (such as the effects on natural resources and on the components, structures, and functioning of affected ecosystems), aesthetic, historic, cultural, economic, social, or health, whether direct, indirect, or cumulative. Effects may also include those resulting from actions which may have both beneficial and detrimental effects, even if on balance the agency believes that the effect will be beneficial. (emphasis added).
The federal agency must prepare an “environmental impact” statement that includes impacts on the human environment. This refers specifically to all those aspects listed above. According to the law, “‘Human environment’ shall be interpreted comprehensively to include the natural and physical environment and the relationship of people with that environment.” The agency is only exempt if the proposed regulation has “no significant impact.”
Like the “carbon” issue discussed in Simpson’s article, “these new… regulations will have a devastating effect on multiple aspects of the human environment,
the EPA cannot unilaterally apply them as proposed. The EPA must negotiate with state and local governments—they only have to ask.” In our case, the agency that must negotiate with Martin County is the Federal Rail Administration that might approve the expansion of Florida East Coast Railway into All Aboard Florida.
Only an actual official body (or one designated by elected officials) can initiate these steps to invoke coordination from the federal agencies and it must be “timely.” The Justice Department is then compelled to action by those very environmental laws that literally choke the system. Some of our Commissioners should feel right at home with these environmental requirements.
Jim McGovern
Martin 9/12 Committee
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
The Stuart News is joining with the lying environmental extremists.
On February 13, the Stuart News published an editorial column excoriating our state Attorney General for taking action in a federal case (American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA) involving federal regulation of waterways. If that were not enough, the editor couched their opposition in such colorful terms that their opinion piece took on the nature of a personal attack. Accusing Attorney General Pam Bondi of “supporting the polluters,” and invoking the image of some unsubstantiated photograph of a single diseased fish supposedly caught in “local waters,” the column slanders Ms. Bondi and distorts the actions of the Attorneys General who are battling against the federal juggernaut of overreach and usurpation of rights.
Where did this lie originate? Local environmental extremist lawyer Ginny Sherlock would have you believe that this case is merely one of concerned citizens against the big, bad industrialists who are intentionally causing damage to public resources without regard to state and federal protections of waterways. She is broadcasting to her email “network” (apparently including the editors of the Stuart News) her complaint against Bondi using similar inflammatory language and urging her compatriots to contact the state authorities against Bondi’s official duties, demanding that Bondi “stop using my money to fight for out-of-state polluters.”
Sherlock’s offensive attack can not be misinterpreted, so please bear with this reproduction of her broadcast email:
Date: February 13, 2014 at 16:14:01 EST
To: Littman Sherlock & Heims <LSHLaw@bellsouth.net>
Cc: Littman Sherlock & Heims <LSHLaw@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Urge Bondi to stop supporting pollutersHere is the e-mail complaint I filed with Attorney General Pam Bondi today (I identified the subject as "Stop Supporting Polluters" and the Company against whom the complaint was filed as Attorney General Pam Bondi):
Why is Attorney General Bondi spending my tax dollars to intervene in an appeal of a lower court's ruling supporting a regional plan to clean up Chesapeake Bay?
I object to Attorney General Bondi siding with polluters, especially when our own Indian River Lagoon is suffering increasing damage from fertilizer and agricultural runoff like that which plagues Chesapeake Bay.
Attorney General Bondi is fighting AGAINST, not for the citizens of Floria[sic] by siding with polluters. Florida citizens are not able to take advantage of programs that provide foreclosure relief or medical care because of incompetence and corruption in our own government here in Florida.
Attorney General Bondi, stop using my money to fight for out-of-state polluters. Pay attention to the very real problems Floridians face as a result of your failure to ensure that citizens of our state get the help they need from federal and state programs.
Ginny Sherlock
While it’s difficult to determine which is the chicken and which is the egg, this type of team bullying has been going on toward our public officials for decades, and they have so far been unchecked. The only voices that our Commissioners and other elected officials have heard for twenty-five years are those who have organized under the flag of George Soros, Al Gore, David Rockefeller, and Maurice Strong. So far, they have succeeded in getting our “representatives” to spend our money to get their way. Only now are Commissioners hearing from citizens who are shocked at the lies and subterfuge used by extremists to run roughshod over your property rights.
Such was the case recently (Feb. 04) when the American Citizens for Property Rights (http://www.ac4pr.org/) and friends appeared to petition the Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners to reconsider their support for the Seven50 Plan for Prosperity from the Southeast Florida Regional Partnership. There the Commissioners saw for the first time in their tenure that ordinary citizens (voters) were indeed concerned about property rights as much as they were concerned for the potential for environmental damage. The speakers, one after the other, demanded that the Commissioners examine the evidence presented by the regional “planners” before making a decision that impacts your property rights and the expenditure of public funds. Perhaps the Commissioners did not understand that this was actual “pushback” against the usual tirade of environmental extremism they have endured for decades. Such folly. It seems that the Board has now been populated by the very people who issued these tirades for many years.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
MI: SMALL FARMERS TARGETED BY BIG GOVERNMENT #tcot
Changes to the Michigan Right to Farm Act
January 23, 2014
by Tony Lollio {EXCERPT}
State regulators want to raid that hen house, and proposed policy changes could turn you and your backyard flock into free-range fugitives.
The Michigan Right to Farm Act was intended to protect commercial farms, but hobbyists and small-scale ranchers have used this law as a defense against nuisance complaints and local zoning disputes. The Michigan Agricultural Commission is considering changes that could end this protection.
These changes would also grant the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) the power to deny private property owners the right to produce meat, eggs, and dairy for their own consumption.
Read the whole story at WatchdogWire…
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Winn: Seven 50 Defeated in Martin County
by Chuck Winn | 17 Dec 2013
Martin County constitutional conservatives owe Jackie Maimone, Sheila Donivan and Phyllis Frey their thanks for their tenacity and leadership over the past 3 months in mobilizing the Seven 50 opposition. Their focus and judgment have been outstanding throughout the process, to include selecting Jerry Kychelhahn as the Seven50 opposition spokesman at today's decisive BCC meeting. The Martin Co. vote was a resounding success against regionalism.
We should also thank Martin GOP Chairman Kate Boland for getting out in front of this with her support of Seven 50 opposition efforts. It was disappointing however, that Commissioner Doug Smith put his supporters’ vision of profits from high density development from the federal HUD trough ahead of government under our Constitutionally prescribed system for the rule of law. Also noteworthy was the total absence of support against Seven 50 from the Martin County Political Leadership Council (formerly the Council of 100). Interesting how the opposition on the Commission was led by Commissioner Heard who many in our ranks have vilified over the past 11 years.
Hopefully in 2014 we can help the Martin Co. School District and our Martin County Legislative Delegation understand the treats that Common Core in the same way we helped the BCC to see the light.
Have a Merry Christmas.
Chuck
Read the news article at TCPalm.com...
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Martin County Should Extricate Itself from Seven 50
by Kate Boland | December 10, 2013 | Martin County, Florida
Martin County is a partner in the Southeast Florida Regional Partnership. The Partnership was created to obtain a federal grant to develop a 50 year plan for sustainable development in seven south Florida counties – the Seven 50 Southeast Florida Prosperity Plan. The funding is part of the Sustainable Communities Initiative (SCI) created by the federal departments of Housing and Urban Development, Environmental Protection and Transportation. The SCI is only the most recent iteration of sustainability policies and programs the federal government has implemented over the past two decades. The goal of the SCI is to create “mechanisms to ensure that sustainability plans are carried through to localities” (HUD, DOT and EPA Partnership: Sustainable Communities, June 16, 2009). The mechanism is the regional partnership and the objective is to remove local barriers to coordinated investments by the federal agencies. Through these partnerships local governments and other partners agree to undertake projects consistent with a sustainability plan.
Seven 50 was created to obtain a planning grant to create this long term plan. When joining the Partnership Martin County signed two agreements that commit the County to certain actions to further the goals of the SCI.
- A Memorandum of Understanding (May 2010) committing the County to work in cooperation with the seven counties to apply for the SCI planning grant and to complete the work program funded under the grant and,
- A Sustainable Communities Grant Consortium Agreement (July 2011) which sets forth specific obligations of the Consortium members.
I have provided a copy of the Agreements highlighted to show the language that implies an ongoing commitment. The purpose of developing the Plan is to achieve implementation, thus the basic understanding of the language of the Consortium Agreement must presume that.
The signatories are committed to implementation of the Plan and support for continuation of operations of the Consortium. In particular the following examples:
In the Memorandum of Understanding: (signatories agree to)
- Follow seven livability principles including: “equitable” affordable housing; investing in neighborhoods that are “walkable”.
- Coordinate their policies and target their funding to meet these principles
- Section II Goal: agree to “achieve and sustain” the Regional Vision and Blueprint (the plan)
- Section IV Roles and Commitments: commit to “develop and implement” the Regional Vision and Blueprint unless it is detrimental to the Partner and the Region
- Also, play specific roles implementing local projects, providing leadership, staff support and financial support
- Section V Governance: agree that the intent is to develop a long term structure for ongoing operations
- Section VI Tier 2 Consortium Membership (includes Martin County): commit to providing leveraged resources; to development and implementation of the Vision and Blueprint (the plan)
Why opt out?
The Consortium agreement anticipates that members may want to opt out, and provides specific terms for doing so. There are numerous reasons to do so to preserve Martin County’s control over decisions affecting the future of our residents.
- Broadly defined, the environment of Martin County is very different [from] the Counties to the South. We have a small population and will almost certainly be dominated by the wishes and objectives of the larger counties.
- Implementation of the plan may conflict with Martin County zoning and Comprehensive Plan.
- Martin County environmental policies may be stronger than those favored by the other Counties
- Plan elements may not be suitable to the culture of Martin County and be inconsistent with the land use patterns that exist. The Seven 50 Plan emphasizes the preference for higher density, mixed use development. The emphasis on walkability, for example, presupposes a preferred choice of housing for higher density housing rather than the demonstrated preference of most residents for single family homes.
- The ongoing structure to implement the Plan has not been fully defined but will be heavily influenced by numerous unelected bodies that are not accountable to the public.
- Two of the specific goals of the County have already been accomplished: access to the wide range of data collected in preparation of the plan to inform future decisions; agreements to upgrade fiber optic technology and expand the opportunities for communication between and among County and regional organizations.
The County does not need to be a member of the Sustainable Communities Consortium to take advantage of the information developed. Remaining in the Consortium potentially exposes the County to, at a minimum, the need to defend its policies and Comprehensive Plan against an action favored by the majority of the other Consortium members. Unless the County formally withdraws from the Consortium, it will be expected to comply with the mandates of HUD and other agencies investing funds to implement the projects proposed in the Seven 50 Plan.
Respectfully submitted December 10, 2013
Kate Boland, Chair, Martin County Republican Executive Committee
Monday, December 9, 2013
SSN: Did Environmental Icon Maggy Hurchalla Finally Outsmart Herself?
Did Environmental Icon Maggy Hurchalla Finally Outsmart Herself?
By: NANCY SMITH | Posted: December 9, 2013
Technology might finally have outsmarted Maggy Hurchalla, one of the state's leading environmentalists -- a champion of Everglades restoration and the author of Martin County's controversial, often-litigious, comprehensive plan rewrites.
What technology are we talking about? Her just-surfaced private email. The kind that never seems to go away. One of the "letters" she wrote to a county commissioner has become a focal point in a lawsuit against her for "tortious interference," legal lingo for interfering with a company's ability to conduct business.
Lake Point, a rock mine located in Martin County, filed the lawsuit against Hurchalla last February, claiming she worked "aggressively behind the scenes" making false statements in an attempt to kill a deal made with the previous commission majority that would transfer the 2,000-acre property to a state agency and allow mining for 20 years.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Is EPA Trying to Skew Climate Change Study for the Obama Administration? #tcot
Is the EPA Trying to Skew Climate Change Study for the Obama Administration?
“When governments can weigh in and request alterations to a scientific analysis, the message is clear."
by BILL STRAUB | November 14, 2013
WASHINGTON – Republican critics of global warming theories are attempting to determine if Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy is exercising undue influence on the conclusions of an upcoming climate change report from a United Nations agency.
Four GOP members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, led by Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), the panel’s ranking member, are concerned that McCarthy is attempting to skew the results of a study from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to reflect the Obama administration’s own apprehension about the purported warming phenomenon.
In a letter to McCarthy dated Nov. 4, the lawmakers cited evidence that the universe is actually in the midst of a 15-year hiatus in temperature increases, asserting that the finding discredits global warming “alarmists.” Yet new reports indicate the EPA is lobbying authors of the IPCC report to conclude that the reduction in warming is linked to heat being transferred to the deep ocean.
“It appears that the U.S. did not suggest an alternative conclusion that the models themselves were flawed,” the Republicans said.
Vitter further said the IPCC’s shortcomings represent “a great embarrassment for a significant number of researchers and politicians who have been demanding costly international and U.S. actions.”
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
THE UNITED NATIONS: ON FLORIDA’S DOORSTEP #tcot
THE UNITED NATIONS: ON FLORIDA’S DOORSTEP
Foreign entities impacting Floridians today - November 13, 2013 by Melinda Meikle
Most residents of Florida would be shocked to realize how the United Nations has established a formidable presence in the sunshine state. As The United Nations casts its long shadow over representational government via local and regional economic development/sustainability plans, such as Seven50, to silently weave a web which runs contrary to economic freedom, property rights and individual liberty.
History shows this anti-freedom progression starting decades ago. The World Heritage Treaty of 1972 granted special powers to designate selected American treasures as “World Heritage Sites and Properties” and “Biosphere Reserves.” Since that time, 68 percent of all U.S. national parks, monuments and preserves are controlled by United Nations UNESCO, including the Everglades in Florida. Paragraph 3(c) states the World Heritage Committee will, [S]eek to ensure an appropriate and equitable balance between conservation, sustainability and development, so that World Heritage properties can be protected through appropriate activities contributing to the social and economic development and the quality of life of our communities.” This has lead to the creation of the Atlas of Florida’s Natural Heritage published by Florida State University Institute of Science and Public Affairs and Florida Natural Inventory.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Ginny Sherlock does not speak for all of us, Mr. Murphy
Martin County Currents: Ginny Sherlock does not speak for all of us, Mr. Murphy
Posted on October 30, 2013 by Barbara Clowdus | http://hobesoundcurrents.com/?p=1695
An email to Congressman Patrick Murphy is hurriedly being circulated among Martin County residents prior to the Nov. 4 County Commission meeting that we find downright offensive. Martin County’s unelected commissioner, Ginny Sherlock, wrote the email blasting Mr. Murphy for his letter (to Commission Chair Sarah Heard) pledging his support for the proposed customs facility at Witham Field.
Mr. Murphy, we want you to know that Ms. Sherlock speaks only for a small minority—quite a vocal one, but nonetheless a minority–particularly considering this proposed customs facility. We also want you to know that voters here did not turn out previous commissioners based on their support of the customs facility, as she told you. That’s an exaggeration that borders on the ridiculous.
Ms. Sherlock has deliberately perpetuated the misconception among her followers that building a customs facility, which then would reclassify Witham Field as an “international” airport, would inevitably transform it into a large, commercial airport. That’s wrong. It’s also dishonest to continue to perpetuate that myth simply to garner oppositional voices through fear.
Her fear is not that we’ll one day have a huge commercial airport, because that cannot happen for a host of reasons. Her fear is that the convenience of having a customs facility here might actually attract a few more people—or even a new business—to Martin County, an anathema to no-growthers.
An “international” classification means simply that international travelers can “check into” this country at Stuart, instead of going to Ft. Pierce or to West Palm Beach first. It does not mean building runways longer and larger to accommodate large commercial jets. Witham Field cannot and will not become another Palm Beach International Airport. It is an economic stimulus for this county because those travelers who must fly to Ft. Pierce or to West Palm Beach now before coming to Stuart are more likely to spend their cash there—at their first stop. We’d rather they spend it here, instead of in Palm Beach or St. Lucie counties. Our still-struggling restaurants and shops—as well as our hotels for guests—need that extra shot of revenue.
We hope also to attract perhaps a few more tourists to the Stuart area, although the projections of additional flights are modest. We like tourists. We like the idea that they come, they spend, but then go home; therefore we want to make their trips here smooth and memorable, so they’ll come back. It also would be the first time that boaters can check in at an airport facility. The combined aircraft/marine facility not only would make a Martin County customs facility unique, but also will make it economically feasible, because we are a community of boaters who take advantage of living only 60 miles from the Bahamas.
We also have international boaters who might ply that wonderful waterway called the St. Lucie River and C-44 canal to Lake Okeechobee and points west, should a customs facility be located in Stuart. It would provide an opportunity for some of our established businesses at Witham Field to grow, maybe adding jobs, and certainly making them healthier. Commissioner Heard calls these businesses “special interests.” We call them “part of the county’s tax base.”
Is the facility funded? Not completely, but the $128,000 shortfall for construction is relatively small, especially since we’re contemplating construction of a $2 million training facility for firefighters, though maybe desirable, will not bring additional revenue to the county. The customs-funding shortfall would be made good if given just a little more time to procure grants.
Is there a risk it won’t be self-sustaining? Yes, but it’s fee-based, so the airport manager could raise the fees, which have been deliberately set lower than those at either Ft. Pierce or West Palm Beach.
And, there are other benefits.
An international status ranks higher than regional in the Federal Aviation Administration’s list of priority airports, so shutting down Witham Field’s control tower as a result of Congressional budget craziness is far less likely. That’s an important point for Stuart residents since those noise-abatement flight patterns are controlled by the tower. Without a tower—which we came close to losing after the sequester—a pilot chooses his own flight pattern.
Perhaps most important, Congressman Murphy, is that Ms. Sherlock and her drummers who insist on quashing every opportunity for real economic growth will ultimately destroy the quality of life of the majority of Martin County residents—the hard-working, don’t-give-me-handouts middle class—and will undermine the entrepreneurial spirit at the heart of our small business enterprises.
Mr. Murphy, the large majority of us do want this customs facility. As one speaker told the county commission at a public hearing earlier this year, a customs facility “will just polish the jewel” that is Martin County. Thank you for pledging to help us find the polish. Now the rest of us just need to apply some elbow grease.
An opinion offered by Martin County Currents is not necessarily endorsed by any of the publication’s advertisers. It may be freely shared, republished or reprinted without permission, as long as the source is cited.



